Notable Elements
- Original exterior limewash and color [Exterior]
- Galleting at stone walls – traditional masonry construction practice [Foundation]
- Use of lime mortar as a caulk at pre-1796 window surrounds [Exterior]
- Clay mortar at base of central chimney [Foundation]
- Lime plaster on riven lath at underside of roof [Interior]
History
The Spencer-Peirce-Little House is set back off the High Road in the center of a large farm which retains the majority of its original 400 acres granted to John Spencer in the early settlement of Newbury in 1635. In 1648, the property was sold to Daniel Peirce, Senior, whose son, Colonel Daniel Peirce, inherited the property upon his father’s death. The younger Peirce was a prominent merchant in that portion of Newbury that came to be known as “Waterside” and was later incorporated as Newburyport, a mercantile town with political interests different from the rest of Newbury which was agrarian. Peirce initially created an entail on the property, indicating that he intended to create a country seat that would descend in his line, in the manner by which English estates were passed to the eldest son or nearest male heir, thereby making them inalienable within one family. The entail was eventually broken and the property sold out of the Peirce family in 1778 to Nathaniel Tracy, a Newburyport merchant and privateer during the Revolutionary War, who made some alterations to the building’s interior and central chimney. Upon Tracy’s death in 1796, the farm was sold to Offin Boardman, a Newburyport merchant who had also been a privateer during the Revolutionary War. Boardman constructed the wood-frame west wing of the house in addition to an attached farmer’s house at the rear of the original stone house. These additions brought the building to its present form.
The Spencer-Peirce-Little House is rare example in New England of an attempt to create manor house architecture and accompanying social aspirations. Built around 1690, the house’s stone construction is unique in Eastern Massachusetts. During this period, sources of building lime in the region were few, while plentiful lumber encouraged settlers built nearly exclusively in the timber-frame tradition they brought with them from England, especially from East Anglia. As initially constructed, the house had a cruciform plan with a mixture of stone walls trimmed with brick, all of which was covered with multiple layers of white limewash. When the west wing was constructed for Offin Boardman in 1796, it was placed directly against the house’s original west wall, concealing and protecting numerous masonry finishes that have not survived on other elevations of the building or on more than a handful of buildings of the period. [Exterior]
Conservative maintenance of the house over subsequent generations retained extensive evidence of original masonry construction of the period in which rubble construction of the period was laid up with gallet stones to fill the wide joints created by fieldstone. [Foundation]
In addition to its masonry features, the house retains many regionally significant architectural elements from Georgian modifications made by Nathaniel Tracy around 1778 and in the Federal style wood-frame wing added by Offin Boardman in 1796.
Date
1690; 1778; 1796
Builder/Architect
unknown
Building Type
Unique plan, not classifiable within New England vernacular building types
Foundation
To make economical use of lime mortar and to reduce the effects of its tendency to shrink in curing, rubble-stone construction was traditionally laid with point-to-point contact between large stones and joints were packed out with small stones (gallets) to fill the wide and irregular joints left by the shapes of undressed stones. Gallets have been removed from the majority of buildings as a result of raking out weathered mortar joints for re-pointing. Modern cement-based mortars tend not to shrink as much as lime mortar during its curing with the result that the function of gallets has largely been forgotten and their removal passes unnoticed. Gallets also served to create a relatively smooth surface to receive limewash or plaster. The masonry walls of the cellar retain substantial areas of original masonry that is protected from weather and that has not been altered by subsequent re-pointing.
The cellar also retains the base of a wide central chimney that has been bisected at a later date with a staircase from the first storey, a change that was presumably made in the latter half of the eighteenth century when large original fireboxes were removed and replaced with smaller, more efficient fireplaces. The piers of the chimney’s supporting arch as well as its springers and arch were laid in clay mortar with relatively wide joints, after which the base was limewashed. Clay mortars remain in position together with fragments of original limewash.Frame
Exterior
One of the most notable elements of the house’s masonry is the survival of substantial areas of its pre-1796 exterior limewash, especially on the west gable of the original house which was enclosed by the Boardman addition of 1796. The depth of limewash layers on this gable, and traditional English building practices suggest that it was an original treatment, or, at least, that it had already been in long usage prior to 1796.
In addition, the wall preserves two rare examples of the methods by which seventeenth-century builders sealed window and wall heads against weather. At the head of the gable, a mortar bevel extends from the ridge to the eaves in a position that would have been applied to the bottom of the original rake board. Since lime plaster and mortar will adhere to wood, this bevel presumably served as a caulk against wind-driven rain. Similarly, a thick bead of mortar applied to the gap between the wooden window case at the gable and the masonry above served to seal the edge of the window frame from weather. Unlike modern caulks that create impermeable barriers that block the evaporation of moisture, lime mortars absorb moisture across broad surfaces from which moisture penetrates to a shallow depth and evaporates quickly when rain stops. At the lower storeys of the west wall, a section of pre-1796 plaster remains in position in the blind arch over the original west window at the first storey. Details of this window are identical to fragmentary window and door trim at the house’s façade. As originally built, or the result of an early alteration, this surround consists of an arch trimmed with moulded brick with a narrow brick keystone. Beneath the arch, the wall was constructed of brick and plastered with a thin coat to a smooth finish, which, in turn, was coated with white limewash to match the body of the house. Evidence for a dark red/iron oxide trim color can be found on most openings, including the west gable window where it appears, perhaps as over-painting, on the brickwork adjacent to the window, and on the interior of the south gable window where it appears as paint on wood trim. The tenacity of exterior limewash can be seen in its survival on nearly all elevations of the structure despite at least one hundred fifty years’ exposure to the weather without renewal. Having had a long history of leaks, as many east elevations do along New England’s coast, the east gable was repaired with lime-based materials in the late 1990s, one of only a handful of early masonry buildings in New England to have its original protective coatings restored. At that time, hard cement-based mortars and skim coats were removed from the wall, joints were pointed with a mortar composed of lime putty, sand and hair (to aid in compacting the mortar into deep joints). The wall was subsequently limewashed to the natural white that lime produces.Roof
The house is enclosed by a steeply pitched main roof that extends east-west with a full-height cross-gable at its north slope and a smaller gable at the head of the two-storey entry porch on the south slope. Roofs are supported by timber-frame structure with lime plaster on the underside of sheathing in selected areas of the seventeenth-century portions of the house that may have been formerly occupied as chambers. [Information needed.]
Interior
Contributor
Brian Pfeiffer from personal inspection & unpublished reports
Sources
Howells, John Mead. Architectural Heritage of the Merrimack. (New York: Architectural Book Publishing Company, 1940) 164-167.
Historic New England: http://www.historicnewengland.org/historic-properties/homes/spencer-peirce-little-farm/spencer-peirce-little-farm-history
National Park Service: Spencer-Pierce-Little Farm Nomination to the National Register of Historic Places (1967). text:http://focus.nps.gov/GetAsset?assetID=1a70c680-b41b-4ee6-be49-66f62729fd7f; photographs: Spencer-Pierce-Little House National Register Photographs 1967